Tuesday, 15 September 2026
ZAR/USDR16.270.15%. Rand weaker against the US dollar
ZAR/EURR18.780.06%. Rand weaker against the euro
ZAR/GBPR21.940.04%. Rand weaker against the pound
Tech & Telco

Kenyan High Court voids Vodacom’s 15% Safaricom stake purchase

Kenyan High Court voids Vodacom’s 15% Safaricom stake purchase
Illustrative image, not of the subject of this story. · Photo: S O C I A L . C U T

The Kenyan high court on Tuesday ruled that the government’s sale of a 15% stake in Safaricom to Vodacom was unconstitutional, null and void, and ordered the shares to be returned to the state.

Vodacom, which had taken control of the block trade on 30 June, said it will review the judgment, lodge an appeal with the court of appeal and apply for a stay pending the outcome. The company added that it would not comment further while the matter is before the courts.

What the sale involved

The transaction saw the Kenyan government sell just over six billion Safaricom shares at KSh34 per share, raising KSh204.3-billion. The proceeds were placed in the National Infrastructure Fund, a state-owned investment vehicle. By buying out Vodafone International Holdings’ remaining interest in Vodafone Kenya, Vodacom lifted its effective holding in Safaricom from 35% to 55%, turning Safaricom from an equity-accounted associate into a consolidated subsidiary.

The court found that the government failed to provide the public with sufficient information about the buyer and the terms of the deal, breaching constitutional requirements for public participation in the disposal of a state asset of this size. It also criticised the lack of clarity around the ring-fencing of the sale proceeds.

Vodacom’s shares on the JSE dropped sharply after the judgment was released, falling to R151, almost four percent below the previous close, before recovering to finish the day at R156, down 0.6%. The quick rebound suggests investors are pricing in a possible stay of the order or doubt the practical reversal of a settled block trade.

For South African investors and other telecom groups, the case underlines the importance of transparent public consultation when governments sell strategic assets. Similar scrutiny has appeared in other cross-border deals in the region, where regulators are increasingly demanding clear documentation of buyer identity and the use of proceeds.

What remains uncertain is whether the appeal will succeed and whether a stay will be granted. Until the legal process is finalised, Vodacom’s control of Safaricom and the associated financial guidance remain in flux.